These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis classified by computed tomography in patients with drug-eluting stents: correlation with invasive coronary angiography. Author: Pan J, Lu Z, Zhang J, Li M, Wei M. Journal: Eur Radiol; 2013 Jan; 23(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 22772148. Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Mehran's in-stent restenosis (ISR) classification by coronary computed angiography (CCTA), with reference to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). METHODS: Consecutive symptomatic patients, who had clinically suspected ISR and implanted stent diameter ≥ 3 mm, were prospectively enrolled in our study. Mehran's classification was employed by CCTA and ICA to classify ISR lesions into four subtypes: focal, diffuse intrastent, diffuse proliferative and total occlusion. CCTA and ICA measurement of lesion length was further compared. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients with 101 implanted stents were included in our study. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of CCTA diagnosis of binary ISR, as shown by patient-based analysis (n = 61), were 100 % (49/49), 75 % (8/12), 92.45 % (49/53) and 100 % (8/8) respectively. Mehran's classification of CCTA correlated well with ICA findings. The diagnostic accuracy of CCTA for class I, class II, class III and class IV lesions was 92.5 %, 91.67 %, 100 % and 100 % respectively. Lesion length was assessed to be significantly longer with CCTA than with ICA (11.03 ± 5.89 mm versus 8.56 ± 4.99 mm, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis can be accurately classified by coronary computed angiography. The lesion length measured by CCTA is longer than that assessed by invasive coronary angiography.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]