These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Microhardness recovery of demineralized enamel after treatment with fluoride gel or CPP-ACP paste applied topically or with dielectrophoresis.
    Author: Ivanoff CS, Hottel TL, Garcia-Godoy F.
    Journal: Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 22779285.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To evaluate the microhardness of demineralized enamel remineralized in saliva after applying 1.23% APF gel or CCP-ACP paste with dielectrophoresis (DEP) or diffusion for 3 minutes. METHODS: In this laboratory study, 25 enamel blocks of bovine incisors were soaked in demineralizing solution (10 mM HCl pH 2.5) for 10 minutes and remineralized in saliva for 1 hour, after applying 1.23% APF gel or CPP-ACP paste without fluoride with dielectrophoresis or conventional topical application for 3 minutes. The mean and percentage changes of surface microhardness in pre-demineralization, post-demineralization and remineralization stages were measured in the five groups. The results of all five groups during the three stages were compared by ANOVA and paired t-tests (P = 0.05). RESULTS: The average surface microhardness recovery of APF gel (12,300 ppm fluoride) applied with DEP was higher than APF gel applied topically, or CPP-ACP paste applied with DEP or topically, and water control (P < 0.05). The percentage of surface microhardness recovery for APF+DEP, APF+Diffusion, CPP-ACP+DEP, CPP-ACP+Diffusion, and water control were 88.17%, 13.62%, 7.14%, 5.45%, and 4.02%, respectively. Demineralization treatment decreased the surface microhardness of enamel in all groups and the surface microhardness recovery in the APF+DEP group was significant (P < 0.001). The only significant paired difference was between APF+DEP and all other groups. No other paired difference approached significance. Surface microhardness recovery of enamel with APF+DEP was 12 times or 1,200% greater than APF gel applied topically, and CPP-ACP paste either applied topically or with DEP in one 3-minute application.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]