These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Immune defense single nucleotide polymorphisms and recruitment strategies associated with contact lens keratitis.
    Author: Carnt NA, Willcox MD, Hau S, Keay L, Dart JK, Chakrabarti S, Stapleton F.
    Journal: Ophthalmology; 2012 Oct; 119(10):1997-2002. PubMed ID: 22809755.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To determine the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of defensin 1B and toll-like receptor 4 with contact lens keratitis susceptibility and severity, and to understand the factors that influence study participation. DESIGN: Retrospective, case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety cases of keratitis and 185 controls recruited from studies conducted at Moorfields Eye Hospital and throughout Australia from 2003 to 2005 were analyzed for genetic associations. The reasons for participation of a subset of 146 participants from 1 site were also investigated. METHODS: Buccal swab samples were collected on Whatman FTA cards and mailed by post for analysis. DEFB1 (rs1799946, -52, rs1800972, -44, and rs11362, -20) and TLR4 (rs4986790, D299G) SNPs were screened by pyrosequencing and analyzed using a regression model for susceptibility (sterile, microbial keratitis [MK], controls) and severity. Study participation was investigated for age, gender, condition, and phone follow-up also using regression analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relative risk of developing contact lens-related keratitis and more severe forms of the disease based on genetic profiles. RESULTS: Carriers of risk alleles of DEFB1 -52 and -20 showed a trend toward increased susceptibility to keratitis (-52: odds ratio [OR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-2.11; P = 0.051; -20: OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.95-1.98; P = 0.088). A DEFB1 promoter haplotype (G-G-A) had a tendency toward decreased susceptibility of MK (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.45-1.03; P = 0.062) and reduced severity (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.30-1.07; P = 0.066). The TLR4 D299G was not associated with type and severity of keratitis. Older age (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.08) and follow-up phone call (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.5) were independent predictors of study participation. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic variation in DEFB1 that may lead to decreased protein expression of hBD-1 exhibits a tendency toward increased susceptibility and severity of contact lens-related keratitis. Investigation of these and other hBD genes that play important roles in animal models in a larger sample size is warranted. The approach of requesting samples from retrospective case series was generally feasible, although significant resources, including repeat phone calls, are required. More targeted strategies to recruit younger individuals to participate in genetic studies may be useful.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]