These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: In vitro optical performance of nonrotational symmetric and refractive-diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses: impact of tilt and decentration.
    Author: Montés-Micó R, López-Gil N, Pérez-Vives C, Bonaque S, Ferrer-Blasco T.
    Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1657-63. PubMed ID: 22819523.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To evaluate the optical quality of Acrysof Restor SN6AD1 refractive-diffractive +3.00 D and Lentis Mplus LS-312 nonrotational symmetric +3.00 D aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and analyze the effect of tilt and decentration. SETTING: University of Valencia, Valencia, and University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: An artificial model eye was used to measure wavefront aberrations of both IOL models. The modulation transfer function (MTF) and point-spread function (PSF) were calculated for a 5.0 mm pupil and under 5 situations: centered, 0.2 mm and 0.4 mm decentered, and 2 degrees and 4 degrees tilted. RESULTS: The refractive-diffractive IOL had the highest MTF values at all spatial frequencies. Similarly, the PSF was worse for the refractive-diffractive IOL. The MTFs for the refractive-diffractive IOL decreased when the IOL was decentered or tilted, being more robust for tilting than decentration. The MTFs for the nonrotational symmetric IOL were similar under all testing conditions. Cutoff frequencies for the refractive-diffractive IOL were stable over the range of tilting studied and comparable with the cutoff when the IOL was centered (approximately 50 cycles per degree [cpd]). When the IOL was decentered, the cutoff frequency decreased by approximately 40 cpd. The nonrotational symmetric IOL cutoff frequencies for misalignment and tilt were low (approximately 30 cpd) and similar under all conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The refractive-diffractive IOL provided better optical quality than the nonrotational symmetric IOL. Tilt and decentration had a significant impact on optical quality with both IOLs, being more severe with the nonrotational symmetric IOL.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]