These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Eukaryotic initiation factor 5B: a new player for the anti-hepatitis C virus effect of ribavirin?
    Author: Galmozzi E, Aghemo A, Colombo M.
    Journal: Med Hypotheses; 2012 Oct; 79(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 22824093.
    Abstract:
    The addition of the broad-spectrum antiviral agent ribavirin (RBV), a synthetic guanosine analog, to interferon-alpha (IFNα) monotherapy has been a major breakthrough in the treatment of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV), as it greatly improved treatment response rates. Although several mechanisms of action have been proposed for RBV's antiviral activity, each with some experimental evidence, the precise mechanism by which it acts synergistically with IFNα has remained elusive. A cornerstone of the antiviral IFNα response is phosphorylation of the α subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)2. This limits the availability of eIF2⋅GTP⋅Met-tRNA(i)(Met) ternary complexes, reduces formation of the 43S preinitiation complexes, ultimately blocking viral (and most cellular) mRNA translation. However recent studies indicated that translation driven by the HCV internal ribosome entry site (IRES) is insensitive to eIF2α phosphorylation. Particularly, in addition to the general eIF2-dependent pathway of translation, the HCV IRES makes use of a bacterial-like, eIF2-independent pathway requiring as initiation factors only eIF5B (an analog of bacterial IF2) and eIF3. Together, these observations support a model in which cellular stresses that induce eIF2α phosphorylation (e.g. treatment with IFNα) cause HCV IRES-directed translation to switch from an eIF2-dependent mode to an eIF5B-dependent mode, defining a tactic used by HCV to evade the INFα response. Eukaryotic eIF5B is a ribosome-dependent GTPase that is responsible for 80S complex formation in translation initiation but shows much lower affinities for GTP than to other GTPases, thus suggesting that it may mis-incorporate the RBV triphosphate (RTP) in place of GTP even at the RBV concentrations achieved in clinical use. Consequently, we theorize that RTP bound to eIF5B lowering its affinity for ribosome, blocks the 80S complex formation on HCV IRES inhibiting the eIF5B-dependent translation used by HCV to elude IFNα response. In conclusion, our hypothesis provides a mechanistic explanation for the phenomenon of RBV enhancement in INFα-based therapy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]