These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Is contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T superior to 1.5 T for detection of coronary artery disease?
    Author: Walcher T, Ikuye K, Rottbauer W, Wöhrle J, Bernhardt P.
    Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 29(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 22825256.
    Abstract:
    The aim is to compare a compiled clinical routine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging protocol performed at both 1.5 and 3 T in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing coronary X-ray angiography. CMR including adenosine perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) at 1.5 T has been established for noninvasive detection of relevant CAD. However, little is known about the potential advantages of 3 T to detect CAD. Fifty-two evaluable patients (62.3 ± 10.2 years) were included into the study. All patients were scanned at both 1.5 and 3 T including adenosine stress and rest perfusion, and LGE imaging. CMR images were analyzed by two blinded readers in consensus. X-Ray angiography served as the reference method. A significant CAD was diagnosed by quantitative coronary analysis. Diagnostic accuracy of the combined analysis of perfusion and LGE imaging yielded better values at 1.5 and 3 T than the analysis of perfusion images alone. Specificity and sensitivity at 3 T was superior to 1.5 T in detecting coronary stenoses ≥50 % (90 vs. 75 % and 84.4 vs. 75 %) and ≥70 % (88 vs. 80 % and 96.3 vs. 88.9 %). This study showed that CMR at 3 T in a routine clinical setting is superior to 1.5 T in detection of significant CAD. 3 T might become the preferred CMR field strength for evaluation of CAD in clinical practice.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]