These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effect of fatigue on tibial rotation after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 3-dimensional kinematic and kinetic matched-group analysis.
    Author: Hantes ME, Tsarouhas A, Giakas G, Spiropoulos G, Sideris V, Christel P, Malizos KN.
    Journal: Am J Sports Med; 2012 Sep; 40(9):2045-51. PubMed ID: 22837426.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Fatigue is an extrinsic factor adversely affecting joint proprioception and neuromuscular response, thereby increasing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) strain and injury risk. The effectiveness of the single- and double-bundle techniques for ACL reconstruction to control residual rotational knee laxity under fatigue has not been examined. HYPOTHESIS: Fatigue results in a significant increase in tibial rotation angles and moments in both ACL-intact and single- and double-bundle ACL-reconstructed knees. The 2 groups with ACL-reconstructed knees will show no significant differences in tibial rotation angles and moments either pre- or postfatigue. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twenty-four male patients who underwent successful single-bundle (n = 12) or double-bundle (n = 12) ACL reconstructions and 10 matched healthy controls were subjected to a standard lower limb muscle fatigue protocol using an isokinetic dynamometer. Three-dimensional motion analysis was used to measure tibial rotation and rotational knee moments in the pre- and postfatigue states, during a swinging maneuver on the weightbearing leg from a standing position with the knee in extension. RESULTS: Tibial rotation of the single-bundle group significantly increased postfatigue (prefatigue 22° ± 10° vs 29° ± 15° postfatigue, P = .015). In contrast, the double-bundle group showed similar tibial rotation values pre- and postfatigue (16° ± 6° vs 18° ± 4°, P = .22). The double-bundle group showed a trend toward decreased tibial rotation values pre- and post-fatigue compared with controls (22 ± 4 and 23 ± 4) (P = .065 and .08, respectively). In the prefatigue state, rotational moments (N·mm/Kg) of the single-bundle (339 ± 148) and double-bundle (317 ± 97) groups were significantly lower than that of controls (465 ± 134) (P = .05 and .03, respectively). In the postfatigue state, an increase was observed in rotational moments of the single-bundle (388 ± 131) and double-bundle (408 ± 187) groups compared with prefatigue values, whereas a decrease was noted in the control group (411 ± 117). CONCLUSION: Single-bundle ACL-reconstructed knees demonstrate a reduced ability to resist rotational loads under fatigue. Double-bundle reconstructed knees had significantly better control of tibial rotation when fatigued. However, they demonstrate an excessive, yet not significant, reduction in tibial rotation compared with the intact knee, suggesting a possible overcorrection in rotational laxity.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]