These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The use of the multi-island vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction.
    Author: Patel NP, Matros E, Cordeiro PG.
    Journal: Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 22868301.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Head and neck cancer extirpation frequently creates complex 3-dimensional defects involving both intraoral and external tissues. Reconstruction can be accomplished either with 2 free flaps, a simultaneous free and pedicle flap, or a single double-island folded free flap. Herein, the outcomes and rationale for reconstruction of multilaminar head and neck defects using the multi-island vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MI-VRAM) flap are reported. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of a prospectively collected database of all head and neck reconstructions completed by a single surgeon between 1992 and 2011. Forty-six patients were identified who underwent reconstruction of composite defects using MI-VRAM flaps. Oncologic defects were classified into 3 categories based on anatomic location, namely, the midface, lower face, and neck. Indications and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Patients' ages ranged from 7 to 84 years with two thirds being male; 45% received preoperative radiation. Average MI-VRAM skin paddle size was 9×25.5 cm. Of the 46 reconstructions, 27 (59%) were performed in the midface, 14 (30%) in the lower face, and 5 (11%) in the neck region. There were no complete flap loses; however, 1 patient lost the external skin island, requiring pectoralis flap coverage. Of these cases, 15% had surgically related complications. Ten patients required secondary contouring procedures to revise bulky flaps. CONCLUSIONS: The MI-VRAM flap is a safe and reliable technique for reconstruction of complex defects throughout the head and neck region. Compared to 2 simultaneous free flaps or a free flap combined with a regional flap, it saves time and eliminates a second donor site. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Clinical question addressed in this paper is whether a multi-island VRAM flap is a safe technique in head and neck reconstruction.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]