These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec genotype effects outcomes of patients with healthcare-associated MRSA bacteremia independently of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration.
    Author: Chen SY, Liao CH, Wang JL, Chiang WC, Lai MS, Chie WC, Chen WJ, Chang SC, Hsueh PR.
    Journal: Clin Infect Dis; 2012 Nov 15; 55(10):1329-37. PubMed ID: 22911641.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Recent evidence has shown that community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) is less virulent than traditional hospital-associated MRSA. We explored whether the antimicrobial susceptibilities of the different strains account for their disparity in clinical virulence. METHODS: This 10-year retrospective cohort study enrolled 291 patients with community-onset, healthcare-associated MRSA bacteremia. The vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type were determined for all isolates. CA-MRSA was defined as an isolate possessing the SCCmec type IV or V genes, and hospital-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) was defined as an isolate possessing SCCmec type I, II, or III genes. Low and high vancomycin MICs were defined as MICs of ≤1 and ≥2 μg/mL, respectively. Patients with bacteremia due to CA-MRSA with a low vancomycin MIC (n = 111), due to HA-MRSA with a low vancomycin MIC (n = 127), or due to HA-MRSA with a high vancomycin MIC (n = 47) entered the outcome analysis. The outcomes of the 2 HA-MRSA bacteremia groups were compared to those of the CA-MRSA bacteremia group. RESULTS: Treatment failure was observed in 35 (31.5%), 59 (46.5%), and 27 (57.4%) of patients with low-vancomycin-MIC CA-MRSA, low-vancomycin-MIC HA-MRSA, and high-vancomycin-MIC HA-MRSA bacteremia, respectively. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, the risk of treatment failure was significantly higher among patients with low-vancomycin-MIC HA-MRSA (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.853; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.006-3.413) and high-vancomycin-MIC HA-MRSA (aOR, 2.393; 95% CI, 1.079-5.309), compared with patients with low-vancomycin-MIC CA-MRSA. CONCLUSIONS: The higher risk for treatment failure among patients with traditional hospital-associated MRSA infections, compared with patients with CA-MRSA infections, is independent of the vancomycin MIC, suggesting a potential intrinsic strain-specific virulence effect.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]