These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Quality and accuracy assessment of nutrition information on the Web for cancer prevention.
    Author: Shahar S, Shirley N, Noah SA.
    Journal: Inform Health Soc Care; 2013 Jan; 38(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 22957981.
    Abstract:
    This study aimed to assess the quality and accuracy of nutrition information about cancer prevention available on the Web. The keywords 'nutrition  +  diet  +  cancer  +  prevention' were submitted to the Google search engine. Out of 400 websites evaluated, 100 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were selected as the sample for the assessment of quality and accuracy. Overall, 54% of the studied websites had low quality, 48 and 57% had no author's name or information, respectively, 100% were not updated within 1 month during the study period and 86% did not have the Health on the Net seal. When the websites were assessed for readability using the Flesch Reading Ease test, nearly 44% of the websites were categorised as 'quite difficult'. With regard to accuracy, 91% of the websites did not precisely follow the latest WCRF/AICR 2007 recommendation. The quality scores correlated significantly with the accuracy scores (r  =  0.250, p  <  0.05). Professional websites (n  =  22) had the highest mean quality scores, whereas government websites (n  =  2) had the highest mean accuracy scores. The quality of the websites selected in this study was not satisfactory, and there is great concern about the accuracy of the information being disseminated.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]