These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Mannitol challenge does not confirm bronchial hyperreactivity in some histamine-responsive asthmatic children.
    Author: Swiebocka EM, Siergiejko G, Siergiejko Z.
    Journal: J Asthma; 2012 Oct; 49(8):817-21. PubMed ID: 22978308.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness of mannitol provocation test to that of classical histamine challenge in children with PC(20)FEV(1) histamine lower than 4 mg/ml. METHODS: Twenty-two adolescent patients (mean age of 15.4 ± 4.1 years) with established asthma (PC(20)FEV(1) histamine below 4 mg/ml) were included in this study. Bronchial challenge with mannitol was performed 1-2 days after the test with histamine. RESULTS: The fraction of positive results of mannitol test was markedly lower when compared with the histamine challenge (72.7% vs. 100%, p = .015). The test was discontinued in one case due to severe coughing after inhalation of 315 mg of mannitol. Coughing during inhalation of dry mannitol powder occurred in most patients, although drinking water after subsequent doses alleviated this symptom in nearly all of them. Of note, triboelectrification of the inhaler and capsules was observed during the administration of consecutive mannitol doses, markedly hindering the delivery of this provoking agent. The relative decrease in FEV(1) resulting from bronchial provocation was significantly lower following mannitol delivery when compared with the histamine test (70.3% vs. 81.6% of resting value, p < .001). Significant correlation was not observed between the values of PC(20)FEV(1) histamine and PD(15)FEV(1) mannitol levels. CONCLUSIONS: Bronchial challenge with mannitol can be used as a screening test in everyday practice, but one cannot exclude bronchial hyperresponsiveness based on its negative results. Moreover, its usefulness is limited by the influence of static on the delivery of sequential mannitol doses and coughing which can be often associated with mannitol inhalation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]