These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Mild traumatic brain injury and postconcussive syndrome: a re-emergent questioning].
    Author: Auxéméry Y.
    Journal: Encephale; 2012 Sep; 38(4):329-35. PubMed ID: 22980474.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Blast injuries are psychologically and physically devastating. Notably, primary blast injury occurs as a direct effect of changes in atmospheric pressure caused by a blast wave. The combat-related traumatic brain injuries (TBI) resulting from exposure to explosions is highly prevalent among military personnel who have served in current wars. Traumatic brain injury is a common cause of neurological damage and disability among civilians and servicemen. Most patients with TBI suffer a mild traumatic brain injury with transient loss of consciousness. A controversial issue in the field of head injury is the outcome of concussion. LITERATURE FINDINGS: Most individuals with such injuries are not admitted to emergency units and receive a variable degree of medical attention. Nevertheless, cranial traumas vary in their mechanisms (blast, fall, road accident, bullet-induced craniocerebral injury) and in their gravity (from minor to severe). The majority of subjects suffering concussion have been exposed to explosion or blast injuries, which have caused minor cranial trauma. Although some authors refuse to accept the reality of post-concussion syndrome (PCS) and confuse it with masked depression, somatic illnesses or post-traumatic stress, we have raised the question again of its existence, without denying the intricate links with other psychiatric or neurological disorders. Although the mortality rate is negligible, the traumatic sequel after mild traumatic brain injury is clear. A difference in initial somatic severity is noted between the serious somatic consequences of a severe cranial trauma compared with the apparently benign consequences of a minor cranial trauma. However, the long-term consequences of the two types of impacts are far from negligible: PCS is a source of morbidity. The prognosis for minor cranial traumas is benign at vital level but a number of patients will develop long-term complaints, which contrast with the negativity of the clinical examination and complementary explorations. The origin of these symptoms questions their organic and psychological aetiologies, which are potentially associated or intricately linked. After a cerebral concussion patients report a cluster of symptoms referred to as postconcussive. CLINICAL FINDINGS: Post-concussion syndrome lies within the confines of somatic symptoms (headaches, dizziness, and fatigue), cognitive symptoms (memory and concentration problems) and affective symptoms (irritability, emotional lability, depression, anxiety, trouble sleeping). The nosographical entity of post-concussion syndrome is still in the process of elaboration following the input of new research intended to determine a cluster of specific symptoms. The persistent post-concussion syndrome is believed to be due to the psychological effects of the injury, biological factors, or a combination of both. Considered in isolation, the symptoms of post-concussion syndrome are non-specific and come together with other diagnostic frameworks such as characterised depressive episodes and post-traumatic stress. Post-concussion syndrome is not specific to concussion but can be present in subjects without any previous cranial trauma. DISCUSSION: Blast trauma can thus be understood as experiencing a shockwave on the brain and as a psycho-traumatic event. The major methodological problem of the studies is the quantification of the functional symptoms present in different nosographical frameworks, which are often co-morbid. Post-traumatic stress disorder is one of several psychiatric disorders that may increase suffering and disability among people with mild traumatic brain injury; in addition mood disorders also seem to be frequent psychiatric complications among these patients. Psychotic disorders after TBI have been associated with several brain regions. The establishment of a causative relationship between TBI and psychiatric disorders is interesting in terms of our understanding of these possible sequelae of TBI. The grey substance of the grey nuclei of the base can also be altered by a scissoring mechanism of the perforating arteries. A cortical contusion through impression of the cortex on the contours of the cranium is frequent. The most common type of injury is traumatic axonal injury. Cerebral lesions that are secondary to TBI associate cell deaths through the mechanisms of apoptosis and necrosis concerning the nerve and glial cells. The scientific objective is to discover an anatomoclinical correlation between the symptoms of post-concussion syndrome and objectifiable brain damage. The predictive value of serum concentrations of the specific serum markers S-100B and neurone specific enolase has been established. CONCLUSION: Cerebral imaging will allow the mechanisms concerned in cranial trauma to be better understood and thus may allow these mechanisms to be linked with co-morbid post-traumatic psychiatric disorders such as depression. The pyschopathological approach provides supplementary enlightenment where neuroimaging studies struggle to establish precise anatomoclinical correlations between neurotraumatic lesions, state of post-traumatic stress, and PCS. Moving away from a purely scientific view to focus on subjectivity, PCS can establish itself in subjects with no history of head trauma thus showing purely psychic suffering. Is the former name of "subjective post-head injury syndrome" no longer pertinent since the neurobiological affections can be objectified? Yet, the latter does not necessarily explain the somatic symptoms. Beyond any opposition of a psychic or somatic causality, it shows the complexity of this interaction. Admittedly, looking for a neuropathological affection is particularly cardinal to propose an aetiological model and objectify the lesions, which should be documented using a forensic approach. However, within the context of treatment, this theoretical division of the brain and the mind becomes less operative: the psychotherapeutic support will on the contrary back the indivisibility of the subject, he/she, who faced the "clatter".
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]