These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Interstitial 192Ir flexible catheter radiofrequency hyperthermia treatments of head and neck and recurrent pelvic carcinomas.
    Author: Goffinet DR, Prionas SD, Kapp DS, Samulski TV, Fessenden P, Hahn GM, Lohrbach AW, Mariscal JM, Bagshaw MA.
    Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1990 Jan; 18(1):199-210. PubMed ID: 2298623.
    Abstract:
    Since September 1983, five patients with head and neck cancers and five patients with pelvic or perineal recurrences of colorectal neoplasms received 192Ir interstitial implants through flexible afterloading catheters that were modified to allow RF hyperthermia treatments of the tumor within 1 hr pre- and post-brachytherapy. Local control in the implant volume was obtained in three of the patients with head and neck cancers (base tongue--2/4; floor of mouth--1/1) with follow-up of 9 to 42 months. Two patients had local recurrences after disease-free periods of 8 and 24 months. Two of the five patients treated for pelvic recurrences had complete responses lasting less than 3 months; prolonged stabilization (12 months) of a presacral mass in a third patient also occurred, but the neoplasm eventually regrew. Average temperatures of 39.2 degrees C to 43.7 degrees C were obtained in the implant volumes of these patients during the 45 minute heating periods which took place prior to loading, and just after removal, of the 192Ir seeds in each patient. No instances of intra or post-operative hemorrhage or necrosis of bone or soft tissues occurred in these patients. However, one individual required a permanent tracheostomy for persistent epiglottic edema after implantation as part of a base-tongue brachytherapy procedure. Interstitial RF hyperthermia in conjunction with brachytherapy appears to be a relatively safe and effective modality, but must be tested prospectively to compare its efficacy to interstitial irradiation alone.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]