These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: C4d deposits in acute "cell-mediated" rejection: a marker for renal prognosis?
    Author: Neves M, Cotovio P, Machado S, Santos L, Macário F, Alves R, Pratas J, Xavier da Cunha M, Mota A, Campos M.
    Journal: Transplant Proc; 2012 Oct; 44(8):2360-5. PubMed ID: 23026593.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Accumulation of C4d along peritubular capillaries (PTC) of renal allografts is normally attributed to antibody-mediated rejection. The prognostic implication of these deposits associated with "cell-mediated" rejection on graft survival remains uncertain. Our study aims to evaluate the impact of C4d deposits along PTC of patients with acute cell- mediated rejection on graft function and survival. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients transplanted between 2005 and 2010 with histopathologic diagnosis of acute rejection (AR). Eleven patients with "pure" antibody-mediated rejection were excluded. The remaining 79 patients were divided into two groups according to type of AR by Banff 2003 criteria: type I (69.6%) versus type II (30.4%). In each group, comparisons were made between C4d-negative (-) and C4d-positive (+) biopsies. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients presented with type I AR: 35 (63.6%) C4d- and 20 (36.4%) C4d+. Twenty-four patients presented with type II AR: 13 (54.2%) C4d- and 11 (45.8%) C4d+. In the type I AR group, graft survival at the first and second years was similar in C4d- and C4d+ patients (94% and 91% versus 75% and 75%, respectively, log-rank P = .26). No differences were encountered in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between subgroups at the first, second, and final years of follow-up. Graft loss occurred in 14.7% of C4d- patients versus 25% in C4d+ patients (P = NS). In the type II AR group, graft survival at the first and second years was similar in C4d- and C4d+ patients (85% and 85% versus 72% and 61%, respectively, log-rank P = .50). No differences were encountered in eGFR between subgroups at the first, second, and final years of follow-up. Graft loss occurred in 30.8% of C4d- patients versus 45.5% in C4d+ patients (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that detection of C4d staining in acute "cell-mediated" rejection does not imply a worse renal prognosis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]