These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Bevacizumab versus ranibizumab in the treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration: a retrospective study of 58 patients.
    Author: De Bats F, Grange JD, Cornut PL, Feldman A, Burillon C, Denis P, Kodjikian L.
    Journal: J Fr Ophtalmol; 2012 Nov; 35(9):661-6. PubMed ID: 23040443.
    Abstract:
    AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab versus ranibizumab in the treatment of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective case-controlled series of 30 patients treated with intravitreal bevacizumab and 28 patients treated with intravitreal ranibizumab for exudative AMD. Main outcomes measured included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) and foveal thickness, quantity of subretinal fluid, neovessel size and total number of injections over the first year treatment period. A secondary outcome was the report of any adverse events in both groups. RESULTS: BCVA stabilized and increased from LogMAR 0.70 to 0.47 in the bevacizumab group and from 0.55 to 0.54 in the ranibizumab group (P>0.05). CMT decreased in the bevacizumab group from 369 to 284 μm and in the ranibizumab group from 340 to 271 μm (P>0.05). The number of injection was significantly lower (4.8) in the bevacizumab group than in the ranibizumab group (5.8) (P<0.05). No serious ocular adverse events were noted in both groups. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study failed to show a difference in visual and anatomic outcomes between bevacizumab and ranibizumab. The number of re-treatment was lower in the bevacizumab group (P=0.03).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]