These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Comparative evaluation of prognostic scores in pulmonary embolism ]. Author: Roca IC, Aursulesei V, Roca M, Datcu MD. Journal: Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2012; 116(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 23077875. Abstract: AIM: Pulmonary embolism is a life threatening disease and one of the main causes of in-hospital mortality. There are multiple risk stratification scoring systems for the forecast of the outcomes in patients with pulmonary embolism. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study to evaluate the comparative validity of four prognostic models: pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI), simplified PESI score, PESI risk classes and shock index, for predicting short-term mortality in acute pulmonary embolism. The PESI and PESI--simplified scores and shock-index were calculated. PESI scores were segregated into risk class (I-V) obtaining PESI classes. Shock index was dichotomized into 0 (for value < 1) versus 1 (for value > 1) risk groups. We determined the area under Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio (LR+, LR-) for PESI score, simplified PESI score, PESI risk classes and shock index, to compare the ability of these scoring tools. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 362 subjects. The mortality was 21.54%. The sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios were different between scores but the area under Receiver Operating Characteristic curve showed values in range 0.6-0.7. CONCLUSIONS: The assessed prognostic scores performed comparably for identifying pulmonary embolism patients at short-term risk of mortality, even for PESI score segregated in risk classes and dichotomized version of shock index.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]