These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Serum calcium measurement: Total versus free (ionized) calcium.
    Author: Sava L, Pillai S, More U, Sontakke A.
    Journal: Indian J Clin Biochem; 2005 Jul; 20(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 23105551.
    Abstract:
    Measurement of serum free (ionized) calcium (Ca(++)) reflects true calcium status of the body in health and disease. Present study evaluates efficacy of Ca(++) over total calcium (CaT) in serum for calcium status. 52 subjects were enrolled for study. Anaerobic fasting blood sample for Ca(++) measurement and autoclaved plain bulb for estimation of CaT, Total protein (TP) and Albumin was used. CaT, Corrected CaT, Ca(++), Calculated Ca(++) were measured and correlated. Corrected CaT and calculated Ca(++) were derived from the measured parameters. Study group showed significant difference between CaT and corrected CaT (p<0.006), Ca(++) and calculated Ca(++) (p<0.001). Negligible correlation was observed between Ca(++) and serum protein. Positive correlation was observed between CaT and calculated Ca(++), TP and albumin. Findings indicate that Ca(++) levels are independent of serum protein status. With scrupulous sampling, Ca(++) may be a better parameter than presently used CaT for assessing calcium status in serum.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]