These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Early life intervention with glucocorticoids has negative effects on motor development and neuropsychological function in 14-17 year-old adolescents.
    Author: ter Wolbeek M, de Sonneville LM, de Vries WB, Kavelaars A, Veen S, Kornelisse RF, van Weissenbruch M, Baerts W, Liem KD, van Bel F, Heijnen CJ.
    Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2013 Jul; 38(7):975-86. PubMed ID: 23107421.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To reduce the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, preterm infants receive neonatal treatment with glucocorticoids, mostly dexamethasone (DEX). Compared to current protocols, treatment regimens of the late 1980s - early 1990s prescribed high doses of DEX for an extensive period up to 6 weeks. Worldwide at least one million children have been treated with this dose regimen. Previous studies have shown adverse effects of neonatal treatment with the glucocorticoid dexamethasone (DEX) on outcome in children aged 7-10 years. On the other hand, treatment with another glucocorticoid, hydrocortisone (HC), was not related to adverse effects in childhood. In the current study we determined the consequences of early life intervention with DEX or HC in adolescents (age 14-17 years). Besides motor function and intellectual capacities, we also examined fundamental neuropsychological functions which have so far received little attention. METHODS: In an observational cohort study we compared 14-17 year-old adolescents who received DEX (.5 mg/kg/day tapering off to .1 mg/kg/day over 21 days, n=63), or HC (5 mg/kg/day tapering off to 1 mg/kg/day over 22 days, n=67), or did not receive neonatal glucocorticoids (untreated, n=71) after premature birth (gestational age<32 weeks). Because gestational age was shorter and duration of ventilation was longer in the DEX-treated group, all analyses were corrected for these potential confounders. Motor function, IQ, and neuropsychological functions were assessed. RESULTS: DEX-treated group participants scored lower on gross motor skill tasks than their HC-treated and untreated counterparts. A higher proportion of DEX-treated girls needed special education compared to the other groups. DEX-treated adolescents performed poorer on neuropsychological tasks measuring alertness, visuomotor coordination, and emotion recognition. The HC-treated group did not differ from the untreated group. CONCLUSIONS: Even after 14-17 years, neonatal treatment with .5 mg/kg/day DEX was associated with adverse effects on motor function, school level, and neuropsychological functions, whereas treatment with the clinically equally effective dose of 5 mg/kg/day HC was not. Potential physiological mechanisms underlying the differences in dexamethasone and hydrocortisone effects are discussed. Based on the current findings, we recommend early identification of neuropsychological deficits after DEX treatment in order to specify extra educational needs.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]