These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Radiation dose study of 64-slice spiral CT coronary angiography: a paired design.
    Author: Xie Z, Wang J, Ding G, Song W, Xu K, Ren K.
    Journal: Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 23135741.
    Abstract:
    To compare image noise and radiation dose differences between prospective and retrospective ECG-gated computed tomography (CT) coronary artery imaging with 64-slice spiral CT (64-MSCT) in a paired design. Prospective and retrospective ECG-gated CT coronary angiography was performed among 20 out-patients with suspected coronary artery diseases. If one protocol failed, chose the other instead. The differences in effective dose (ED), image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) between the two scan protocols were compared. Usual causes of failures were analysed for each. The average ED of retrospective and prospective protocol was 21.6±2 and 6.0±1.2 mSv, respectively. There was a significant statistical difference in the two protocols (p < 0.05 and 6.16e(-14)). The image noise and SNR between the two protocols made no differences (p=0.71, 0.26, >0.05). The average image noise and SNR of retrospective and prospective protocol were (27.95±2.82, 28.66±2.9) and (12.15±1.83, 10.9±1.17). The CNR of retrospective and prospective protocol was (14.52±1.59) and (17.3±2.09), respectively. There was a statistical difference (p < 0.05 and 0.045). The prospective protocol can lower the ED of 64-MSCT a lot than the retrospective protocol. The image noise and SNR made no differences, whereas the prospective protocol gave a better CNR result.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]