These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Resynchronization improves heart-arterial coupling reducing arterial load determinants.
    Author: Zócalo Y, Bia D, Armentano RL, González-Moreno J, Varela G, Calleriza F, Reyes-Caorsi W.
    Journal: Europace; 2013 Apr; 15(4):554-65. PubMed ID: 23143859.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has benefits on left ventricle (LV) performance, but its mid-term effects on LV load and LV-arterial coupling are unknown. AIMS: To evaluate CRT mid-term effects on LV-arterial coupling, arterial load and its determinants, and the association between CRT-dependent aortic haemodynamic changes and the arterial biomechanics. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiac and aortic echographies were done in 25 patients (age: 61 ± 12 years; 14 men; New York Heart Association functional classes III-IV; LV ejection fraction = 28 ± 7%, QRS = 139 ± 20 ms) before and after (23 ± 12 days) CRT. Standard structural and functional parameters and dyssynchrony indices were evaluated. Ascending aorta flow and diameter waveforms were measured. Central pressure was derived using a transfer function and the diameter calibration method. Calculus: arterial elastance (EA); aortic impedance (Zc) and distensibility (AD); systemic resistances (SVR), total compliance (CT); global reflection coefficient; LV end-systolic elastance (EES); and LV-arterial coupling (EA/EES). After CRT EA diminished (-30%;P = 0.001), EES increased (29%; P = 0.001) and EA/EES improved (pre-CRT: 2.9 ± 0.9, post-CRT: 1.6 ± 0.7; P = 0.001). Arterial elastance changes were associated with changes in arterial properties. Cardiac resynchronization therapy was associated with pressure-independent increase in mean aortic diameter (pre-CRT: 30.0 ± 4.0 mm, post-CRT: 33.0 ± 5.1 mm; P = 0.005) and distensibility (pre-CRT: 3.8 ± 2.6 × 10(-3)mmHg(-1), post-CRT: 6.4 ± 2.5 × 10(-3) mmHg(-1); P = 0.002), and Zc reduction (pre-CRT: 3.5 ± 1.8 × 10(-2)mmHg.s/mL, post-CRT:1.9 ± 0.8 × 10(-2) mmHg.s/mL; P = 0.001) and SVR (pre-CRT:1.7 ± 0.4 mmHg.s/mL, post-CRT:1.0 ± 0.3 mmHg.s/mL; P = 0.001). Changes in EA determinants were associated with changes in aortic flow. CONCLUSION: Early after CRT central and peripheral arterial biomechanics improved, determining a pressure-independent increase in aortic diameter and a reduction in arterial load. Left ventricular systolic performance and LV-arterial coupling were enhanced. Arterial biomechanical changes were associated with aortic flow changes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]