These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Evaluation of computational methods for HLA three loci haplotype by compare with family-based data]. Author: Tang MZ, Li J, Cai YL, Zheng YM, Liao J, Zeng H, O'Brien S, Zeng Y. Journal: Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 26(4):288-90. PubMed ID: 23189847. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the accuracy and efficiency of computational inference methods for haplotype on estimate HLA-A-B-C haplotype frequencies by compared with the haplotypes manually defined in a family-base dataset. METHODS: 558 individuals with pedigree information were selected, and their haplotyps were compared with the data obtained by the following three method: the Expectation-Maximization (EM) and Excoffier-Laval-Balding (ELB)algorithms using the AELEQUIN software, and the SAS/Genetics PROC HAPLOTYPE method. RESULTS: After performing the SAS/Genetics method, and the Expectation-Maximization (EM) and Excoffier-Laval-Balding (ELB) algorithms using the AELEQUIN software, 248, 247, and 238 different haplotypes were obtained respectively. The accuracy rates of these three methods were 88.5%, 89.1%, and 90.3% respectively. There are no significant different in the accuracy and estimated haplotype frequency comparisons among any two of these computational inference methods. CONCLUSION: High accuracy haplotype frequency estimate rates could be obtained by these three computational inference methods, and there are no significant difference in the comparison of haplotypes estimated by SAS/Genetics, the EM and ELB algorithms using the AELEQUIN software. However, ELB algorithm shows better performance than EM algorithm and SAS/Genetics PROC HAPLOTYPE method for haplotype frequencies estimation in general.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]