These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of early biomarker strategies with the Heart Foundation of Australia/Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand guidelines for risk stratification of emergency department patients with chest pain.
    Author: Cullen L, Parsonage WA, Greenslade J, Lamanna A, Hammett CJ, Than M, Ungerer JP, Chu K, O'Kane S, Brown AF.
    Journal: Emerg Med Australas; 2012 Dec; 24(6):595-603. PubMed ID: 23216719.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To compare cardiac risk stratification using a 0 and 2 h point-of-care (POC) cardiac troponin (cTn), 0 and 2 h POC multi-biomarkers against the 0 and 6 h laboratory cTn reference standard. METHODS: A prospective observational study of ED patients presenting with chest pain was performed. Patients were risk stratified and treated as per the Heart Foundation of Australia/Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (HF-A/CS-ANZ) guidelines using the 0 and 6 h laboratory cTn (T6). Patients were further stratified using a 0 and 2 h POC cTn (T2) plus 0 and 2 h POC multi-biomarkers (cTn, creatine kinase-MB, myoglobin) (M2). The T6, T2 and M2 strategies were compared using the 30-day major adverse cardiac events as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Seven hundred and four patients (median age 54 years, male 62.1%) were enrolled. Using the T6 reference standard, 2%, 61% and 37% were stratified as low, intermediate and high risk, respectively. The 30-day event rates were 0%, 3.5% and 28.6%, respectively. The T2 strategy stratified 1.5%, 57% and 41% as low, intermediate and high risk, respectively, with 30-day event rates of 0%, 4.2% and 24.8%, respectively. The M2 strategy resulted in significantly different risk distribution with 1%, 40% and 59% stratified as low, intermediate and high risk, respectively, with 30-day event rates of 0%, 3.9% and 18.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Using a 2 h POC cTn-only biomarker strategy with the HF-A/CS-ANZ guidelines accurately identified a population at intermediate risk of 30-day events in whom further objective testing might be accelerated, allowing subsequent early discharge of the majority of this cohort. Within 2 h of presentation a high risk population could be identified in whom early management, including admission, was required.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]