These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Prevention of tunneled cuffed hemodialysis catheter-related dysfunction and bacteremia by a neutral-valve closed-system connector: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Author: Bonkain F, Racapé J, Goncalvez I, Moerman M, Denis O, Gammar N, Gastaldello K, Nortier JL.
    Journal: Am J Kidney Dis; 2013 Mar; 61(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 23228946.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis (HD) tunneled cuffed catheters may be fitted with neutral-valve closed-system connectors. Such connectors, which are flushed with saline solution and used for 3 consecutive HD sessions, provide a mechanically closed positive-pressure barrier and potentially may be useful to prevent catheter-related bacteremia and dysfunction. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center randomized controlled trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 66 adult HD patients with a tunneled cuffed catheter. INTERVENTION: Neutral-valve closed-system connector (Tego Needlefree Hemodialysis Connector) versus trisodium citrate, 46.7%, locking solution (Citra-Lock; control group). OUTCOMES: Primary composite outcome was the incidence rate of catheter-related dysfunction or bacteremia. Secondary outcomes were the separate incidence rates of catheter-related dysfunction and bacteremia and the cost of both procedures. MEASUREMENTS: Catheter dysfunction was defined as the requirement of urokinase and/or a mean blood flow ≤250 mL/min during 2 consecutive HD sessions. Catheter-related bacteremia was defined as ≥2 positive blood cultures. Time of catheter use was calculated and the incidence rate of complications was expressed per 100 person-years. RESULTS: 66 patients were followed up for a median of 86 (IQR, 29-200) days. The composite primary outcome was not significantly reduced in the closed-system-connector intervention group versus the citrate-locking-solution control group (63.56 vs 71.51 per 100 person-years; P = 0.3). Catheter dysfunction in the intervention group was not decreased versus controls (59.59 vs 51.64 per 100-person-years; P = 0.9). Only 6 catheter-related bacteremia events were identified, one in the intervention group (3.97 vs 19.86 per 100 person-years; P = 0.06). LIMITATIONS: Small size of the patient population and single-center study. CONCLUSIONS: Superiority of the closed-system connector in terms of prevention of the primary efficacy end point compared to the standard locking solution was not observed. Further evaluation in a larger study is suggested.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]