These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Two cases of thyroid dysgenesis caused by different novel PAX8 mutations in the DNA-binding region: in vitro studies reveal different pathogenic mechanisms. Author: Hermanns P, Grasberger H, Cohen R, Freiberg C, Dörr HG, Refetoff S, Pohlenz J. Journal: Thyroid; 2013 Jul; 23(7):791-6. PubMed ID: 23308388. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Mutations in PAX8, a transcription factor gene, cause thyroid dysgenesis (TD). The extreme variability of the thyroid phenotype makes it difficult to identify individuals harboring PAX8 gene mutations. Here we describe two patients with TD and report two novel PAX8 gene mutations (S54R and R133Q). We performed in vitro studies to functionally characterize these mutations. METHODS: Using PAX8 expression vectors, we investigated whether the PAX8 mutants localized correctly to the nucleus. To analyze the DNA-binding properties of S54R and R133Q, electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed. Furthermore, we measured whether the mutant PAX8 proteins were able to activate the thyroglobulin (TG)- and the thyroperoxidase (TPO)-promoters. RESULTS: S54R had an impaired binding to DNA and a negligible activity on the TG- and the TPO-promoters. The DNA-binding property of R133Q, which is located in the highly conserved terminal portion of the PAX8 DNA-binding domain, was normal. Interestingly, it also exhibited dramatically impaired activation of the TG- and TPO-promoters. However, R133Q has no dominant negative effect on the WT protein in vitro. Thus, the underlying molecular mechanism by which the function of R133Q is impaired remains to be elucidated. CONCLUSIONS: We identified and functionally characterized two novel mutations of the PAX8 gene that lead to TD by distinct mechanisms. A structural defect of the mutant R133Q leading to a reduced capability for induced fit upon DNA interaction might explain the disparity between its apparently normal binding to DNA, but lack of promoter activation.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]