These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: The effect of lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy on medial knee opening: clinical and biomechanical factors. Author: Hetsroni I, Lyman S, Pearle AD, Marx RG. Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2014 Jul; 22(7):1659-65. PubMed ID: 23354170. Abstract: PURPOSE: The case of a patient with knee valgus and instability due to combined ACL-MCL laxity who underwent lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) is presented. The symptoms of instability resolved following the surgery. It was unclear whether the increase in valgus stability was related only to a decrease in valgus moments during stance or also to a medial tensioning effect. We therefore performed a laboratory cadaveric study. The purpose of this study was to examine whether after MCL and ACL sectioning, lateral opening wedge DFO would result in decrease in medial opening under static conditions of valgus stress. METHODS: Medial knee opening under valgus load of 9.8 Nm was tested in 8 cadaveric specimens in scenarios of MCL and ACL sectioning and compared before and after performing lateral opening wedge DFO. RESULTS: When the superficial MCL was sectioned, medial knee opening in 30° flexion decreased after lateral opening wedge DFO compared to medial opening before the osteotomy (i.e. from 6.5 ± 0.5° to 5.6 ± 0.5°, p = 0.01). When the superficial MCL, deep MCL, and ACL were all sectioned, medial knee opening in extension decreased after lateral opening wedge DFO compared to medial opening before the osteotomy but this was not significant (i.e. from 6.8 ± 0.5° to 6.1 ± 0.5°, p = n.s.). CONCLUSION: In superficial MCL-transected knees, medial laxity at 30° of knee flexion decreased after lateral opening wedge DFO. However, the clinical relevance of the laxity decrease observed remains uncertain since the reduction was small in magnitude.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]