These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Accuracy of segmental multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis for assessing whole-body and appendicular fat mass and lean soft tissue mass in frail women aged 75 years and older.
    Author: Kim M, Kim H.
    Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr; 2013 Apr; 67(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 23388666.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the accuracy of segmental multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (SMF-BIA) for the assessment of whole-body and appendicular fat mass (FM) and lean soft tissue mass (LM) in frail older women, using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a reference method. SUBJECTS/METHODS: All 129 community-dwelling Japanese frail older women with a mean age of 80.9 years (range, 75-89 years) from the Frailty Intervention Trial were recruited. The agreements between SMF-BIA and DXA for whole-body and appendicular body composition were assessed using simple linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: High coefficients of determination (R(2)) for whole-body FM (R(2)=0.94, s.e. of estimate (SEE)=1.2 kg), whole-body LM (R(2)=0.85, SEE=1.4 kg), and appendicular FM (R(2)=0.82, SEE=1.1 kg) were observed between SMF-BIA and DXA. The R(2) coefficient for appendicular LM was moderate (R(2)=0.76, SEE=0.8 kg). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that there was systematic (constant) bias (that is, DXA minus SMF-BIA) with overestimation of whole-body FM (bias=-1.2 kg, 95% confidence interval (CI)=-1.5 to -0.1) and underestimation of whole-body LM (bias=2.1 kg, 95% CI=1.8-2.3) by SMF-BIA. Similar, the appendicular measurements also demonstrated systematic bias with overestimation of appendicular FM (bias=-0.3 kg, 95% CI=-0.5 to -0.1) and underestimation of whole-body LM (bias=1.5 kg, 95% CI=1.4-1.7) by SMF-BIA. In addition, the individual level accuracy demonstrated a non-proportional bias for whole-body LM (r=0.08, P=0.338) and appendicular FM (r=0.07, P=0.413). CONCLUSIONS: SMF-BIA had acceptable accuracy for the estimation of whole-body and appendicular FM and LM in frail older women, although SMF-BIA underestimated LM and overestimated FM relative to DXA.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]