These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Peri-implant bone formation of non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma-treated zirconia implants with different surface roughness in rabbit tibiae.
    Author: Shon WJ, Chung SH, Kim HK, Han GJ, Cho BH, Park YS.
    Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):573-9. PubMed ID: 23406227.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the osseointegration of powder-injection molded (PIM) zirconia implants in rabbit tibiae with or without He plasma treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-five rabbits received 4 types of external hex implants with identical geometry in the tibiae: PIM zirconia implants, roughened PIM zirconia implants, plasma-treated PIM zirconia implants, and plasma-treated roughened PIM zirconia implants. The contact angles of the four types of implants were evaluated. Removal torque tests and histomorphometric analyses were performed. RESULTS: The plasma treatment markedly enhanced the hydrophilicity, but did not seem to change the surface topography of the PIM zirconia implants. There were statistically significant differences in the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) ratios, bone volume (BV/TV), and removal torque values (RTQ) among the tested implant types (P < 0.001). The plasma-treated implants exhibited significantly higher BIC and BV/TV values than the untreated implants. However, the removal torque values favored the rough surface. CONCLUSIONS: The He plasma treatments on PIM zirconia implants made the surface more hydrophilic and enhanced the osseointegration of the implants without changing the micro-topography.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]