These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Simulation of motion on the skin. III. Mechanisms used by rapidly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the primate hand for spatiotemporal resolution and two-point discrimination.
    Author: Gardner EP, Palmer CI.
    Journal: J Neurophysiol; 1990 Apr; 63(4):841-59. PubMed ID: 2341881.
    Abstract:
    1. The contribution of rapidly adapting (RA) mechanoreceptors to two-point discrimination has been evaluated by examining their ability to resolve the spacing of grating patterns shifted across the skin. The experiments test two different neural coding mechanisms that have been proposed to underlie resolution of spatial detail on the hand: 1) a rate-intensity code in which the spacing of surface features is encoded by the average frequency of firing of individual sensory afferents, and 2) an isomorphic representation of shape in which variations in the firing patterns of individual afferents reflect the spatiotemporal profile of skin indentation. 2. To measure the spatial acuity of RA mechanoreceptors innervating the hands of macaque monkeys, we displayed pairs of horizontal bars spaced 1-13 mm apart on a computer-controlled OPTACON stimulator placed over glabrous skin. Two-point resolution was measured by simultaneously pulsing pairs of rows at rates of 100, 50 and 25 Hz; each pair was shifted in tandem across the hand to simulate lateral motion. Single-fiber recordings were made from physiologically identified RA afferents in anesthetized monkeys. 3. Receptive field diameter appears to be the critical determinant of spatial resolution of gaps between two bars. RAs fire continuously if bar spacing is less than the field diameter but do not summate inputs when both active rows are contained within the field. Response profiles evoked by two bars spaced less than 4.8 mm apart can be predicted from the single-bar profiles, assuming occlusion between overlapping inputs with the strongest member dominating axonal output. Two-thirds of the RAs tested discharge 1 spike/pulse as bar patterns cross the field, yielding a uniform spike train whose frequency reflects stimulus pulse rates but fails to indicate gaps between bars. An additional 17% fire 2 spikes/pulse when the bars contact or straddle the field center, but also fail to differentiate individual stripes spaced less than 3.6 mm apart. 4. Only 17% of RAs represent gaps narrower than the field diameter. These fibers show double-peaked response profiles to bar patterns spaced at least 2.4 mm apart, firing 2 spikes/pulse as first one, and then the second stripe crosses the field center. Timing between peaks corresponds to bar spacing. Responses are reduced in amplitude when adjacent bars straddle the field center, as occlusion between simultaneous inputs prevents summation of inputs from the two stimuli. Fifteen of 16 RAs failed to resolve bars spaced 1.2 mm apart, as double-spike responses were evoked only by the leading stripe.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]