These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effects of modified foodservice practices in military dining facilities on ad libitum nutritional intake of US army soldiers.
    Author: Crombie AP, Funderburk LK, Smith TJ, McGraw SM, Walker LA, Champagne CM, Allen HR, Margolis LM, McClung HL, Young AJ.
    Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet; 2013 Jul; 113(7):920-7. PubMed ID: 23419999.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Modifying foodservice practices in military dining facilities could influence ad libitum nutritional intake patterns of soldiers. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine how changes in foodservice operations consistent with 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans affected soldiers' ad libitum nutritional intake in military dining facilities (DFACs). DESIGN: Ten DFACs participated, and the intervention was implemented in five DFACs in an independently sampled, partial crossover design. Nutrient intake of diners was assessed during a test meal using digital photography, and customer satisfaction with foodservice was assessed via surveys at baseline (n=602), and again at 6 months (n=519) and 12 months (n=458) after the intervention was implemented. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteers were US Army active duty soldiers recruited from among diners at 10 DFACs on Fort Bragg, NC. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were intakes of energy and total fat, and percent energy from fat and saturated fat. Differences between diners' intakes in control and intervention DFACs were assessed using independent samples t tests. RESULTS: At 6 months after implementing the intervention, diners at intervention DFACs had significantly lower lunchtime intakes of energy (945±338 kcal vs 1,061±380 kcal), total fat (38±19 g vs 47±25 g), percent energy from fat (35%±10% vs 39%±11%) and saturated fat (4.7%±1.7% vs 5.6%±2.3%), discretionary fat (30±18 g vs 39±24 g), and refined grains (2.3±1.7 oz equivalents vs 2.8±2.4 oz equivalents) compared with diners at control DFACs. Further, diners at intervention DFACs rated customer satisfaction higher than diners at control DFACs. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that modest changes in military DFAC serving practices to promote healthy eating and food selection can facilitate positive changes in soldiers' nutritional intake.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]