These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Detection accuracy of condylar bony defects in Promax 3D cone beam CT images scanned with different protocols.
    Author: Zhang ZL, Cheng JG, Li G, Shi XQ, Zhang JZ, Zhang ZY, Ma XC.
    Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(5):20120241. PubMed ID: 23420852.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To investigate and compare the detection accuracy of bony defects on the condylar surface of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in cone beam CT (CBCT) images scanned with standard and large view protocols on the same machine. METHODS: 21 dry human skulls with 42 TMJs were scanned with the large view and standard view protocols of the CBCT scanner Promax 3D (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland). Seven observers evaluated all the images for the presence or absence of defects on the surface of the condyle. Using the macroscopic examination of condylar defects as the gold standard, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. RESULTS: Macroscopic examination revealed that, of the 42 condyles, 18 were normal and 24 had a defect on the surface of the condyles. Areas under the ROC curves for the large view and the standard view group of CBCT images were 0.739 and 0.720, respectively, and no significant difference was found between the two groups of images (p = 0.902). Neither the interobserver nor the intraobserver variability were significant. CONCLUSIONS: The two scanning protocols provided by the CBCT scanner Promax 3D were reliable and comparable with detection of condylar defects.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]