These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Performance variability of seven commonly used self-monitoring of blood glucose systems: clinical considerations for patients and providers.
    Author: Brazg RL, Klaff LJ, Parkin CG.
    Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jan 01; 7(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 23439170.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Blood glucose data are frequently used in clinical decision making, thus it is critical that self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) systems consistently provide accurate results. Concerns about SMBG accuracy have prompted the development of newly proposed International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards: ≥ 95% of individual glucose results shall fall within ± 15 mg/dl of the results of the manufacturer's reference procedure at glucose concentrations <100 mg/dl and within ± 15% for values ≥ 100 mg/dl. We evaluated seven marketed systems against the current and proposed ISO criteria (criterion A). METHOD: Capillary blood samples were collected from 100 subjects and tested on seven systems: Accu-Chek Aviva Plus, Advocate Redi-Code, Element, Embrace, Prodigy Voice, TRUEbalance, and WaveSense Presto. Results were compared with manufacturer's documented reference system, YSI or perchloric acid hexokinase; three different strip lots from each system were tested on each subject, in duplicate. RESULTS: Compared against current ISO criteria (≥ 95% within ± 15 mg/dl for values <75 mg/dl and ± 20% for values ≥ 75 mg/dl) the Accu-Chek Aviva Plus, Element, and WaveSense Presto systems met accuracy criteria. However, only the Accu-Chek Aviva Plus met the proposed ISO criteria (criterion A) in all three lots. The other six systems failed to meet the criteria in at least two of the three lots, showing lot-to-lot variability, high/low bias, and variations due to hematocrit. CONCLUSIONS: Inaccurate SMBG readings can potentially adversely impact clinical decision making and outcomes. Clinicians can reduce controllable variables by prescribing accurate SMBG systems. Adherence to the proposed ISO criteria should enhance patient safety by improving the accuracy of SMBG systems.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]