These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Meta-analysis on comparison of long-term complications and quality of life between two digestive tract reconstruction techniques following total gastrectomy]. Author: Kang Y, Wei YZ, Xue YW. Journal: Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 16(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 23446472. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of postoperative long-term complications and quality of life between two digestive tract reconstruction techniques after total gastrectomy in order to provide evidence for clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out to obtain studies of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of reconstruction techniques including jejunal interposition and Roux-en-Y. Data extracted from RCTs for meta-analysis were independently assessed by two reviewers. A meta-analysis was performed by RevMan5.0 software. RESULTS: A total of 1628 gastric cancer cases undergoing total gastrectomy from 10 RCTs were eligible for inclusion, among whom 728 received jejunal interposition reconstruction and 954 Roux-en-Y anastomosis. As compared with Roux-en-Y anastomosis, jejunal interposition reconstruction significantly decreased the incidence of dumping syndrome (OR=0.19, 95%CI:0.11-0.34, P<0.01), increased the prognostic nutritional index (WMD=6.02, 95%CI:1.82-10.22, P<0.01), and improved the body weight postoperatively (WMD=-2.45, 95%CI:-3.81--1.71, P<0.01). Meanwhile, jejunal interposition reconstruction did not prolong operative time and hospital stay (both P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Jejunal interposition has better efficacy than Roux-en-Y in dumping syndrome and quality of life, and is a reasonable and effective digestive tract reconstruction for long-term survival of gastric cancer patients.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]