These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Testing of midwife neonatal resuscitation skills with a simulator manikin in a low-risk delivery unit. Author: Rovamo LM, Mattila MM, Andersson S, Rosenberg PH. Journal: Pediatr Int; 2013 Aug; 55(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 23461735. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Expertise in neonatal resuscitation is essential for personnel involved in the care of newborns. In this observational cohort study the skills of 52 midwives in a simulated scenario were assessed. METHODS: A total of 52 midwives in a low-risk unit and five specialist nurses in a high-risk unit were tested to establish their competence in newborn resuscitation. The 52 midwives were divided into groups 1 (n = 39; no pretest training) and 2 (n = 13; 1 day training prior to study). The video-recorded test scenario was a newborn with asphyxia. Thirty items were graded by a neonatologist and nursing team in real time. Using the Angoff method, a pass score was 18.71 for skills that were graded 0 or 1. RESULTS: The average score of specialist nurses was 26 (range, 23-29). A total of 49% of midwives in group 1 and 92% in group 2 passed the test. The average score was 17.7 (range, 9-25) in group 1 and 21.9 (range, 17-27) in group 2. A total of 27% and 77% of midwives in groups 1 and 2, respectively, carried out ventilation at a frequency as per the algorithm. Mask leakage was higher in group 1 (44%) versus group 2 (23%). Five and three midwives in groups 1 and 2, respectively, overexpanded the lungs. CONCLUSION: Many midwives had imperfect resuscitation skills. A 1 day course improved such skills. The standard scenario is an objective and useful performance marker in assessing and documenting improvements in competence in delivery room resuscitation.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]