These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Detection of underlying malignancy in patients with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT.
    Author: Schramm N, Rominger A, Schmidt C, Morelli JN, Schmid-Tannwald C, Meinel FG, Reiser MF, Rist C.
    Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Jul; 40(7):1014-24. PubMed ID: 23503574.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To determine the value of combined (18)F-FDG PET/CT with diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in detecting primary malignancies and metastases in patients with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) and to compare this with CECT alone. METHODS: PET/CT scans from 66 patients with PNS were retrospectively evaluated. Two blinded readers initially reviewed the CECT portion of each PET/CT scan. In a second session 3 months later, the readers analysed the combined PET/CT scans. Findings on each study were assessed using a four-point-scale (1 normal/benign; 2 inconclusive, further diagnostic work-up may be necessary; 3 malignant; 4 inflammatory). Sensitivity and specificity for malignant findings were calculated for PET/CT and CECT. Interreader agreement was determined by calculating Cohen's kappa. Pooled data from clinical follow-up (including histopathology and follow-up imaging, median follow-up 20.0 months) served as the reference gold standard. RESULTS: Both readers classified 12 findings in ten patients (15%) as malignant on the PET/CT scans (two patients had two primary tumours). One such imaging finding (suspected thymic cancer) was false-positive (i.e. benign histology). The most common tumours were bronchial carcinoma (n = 3), lymph node metastases of gynaecological tumours (n = 3) and tonsillar carcinoma (n = 2). Three of 12 findings (25%) were not detected by CECT alone (cervical carcinoma, lymph node metastasis and tonsillar carcinoma). In a per-patient analysis, sensitivity and specificity for malignant findings were 100% and 90% for PET/CT and 78% and 88% for CECT. In 24% (reader 1) and 21% (reader 2) of the patients, the PET/CT findings were inconclusive. Of these findings, 57% (reader 1) and 56% (reader 2) were only diagnosed with PET (e.g. focal FDG uptake of the thyroid, gastrointestinal tract and ovaries). On follow-up, none of these findings corresponded to malignancy. Overall agreement between the two readers was excellent with a Cohen's kappa of 0.95 ± 0.04 (p < 0.001) for PET/CT and 0.97 ± 0.03 (p < 0.001) for CECT alone. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients with PNS, PET/CT exhibited improved detection of underlying malignancy versus CECT alone. While hybrid imaging produces a greater number of inconclusive findings, sensitivity is increased for the detection of head and neck and gynaecological malignancies as well as metastatic lymph node involvement.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]