These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Effect of gene transfection at different time on bone mineral density and strength of newly formed bone in mandibular distraction gap in rabbit].
    Author: Hu CB, Wu GP, Zhou B, He XC, Lan YS, Guo L.
    Journal: Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 28(6):449-53. PubMed ID: 23520783.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of gene transfection at different time on bone mineral density and strength of newly formed bone in mandibular distraction gap in rabbit, so as to explore the optimal time for gene therapy and enhance the therapeutic effect. METHODS: 48 New-Zealand rabbits were employed to receive mandibular osteotomy and implantation of distraction devices bilaterly. Then the rabbits were randomly divided into 4 groups as group A, B and C and D. The animals in group A, B, and C were transfected with recombinant plasmids pIRES-hBMP2-hVEGF165 via electroporation-mediated approach at latency period, distraction period, consolidation period respectively. Group D was used as control group without gene transfection. After 3 days of latency period, the distraction devices were activated at the rate of 0.8 mm per day for 10 days. Three rabbits in each group were sacrificed at 1 wk, 2 wk, 4 wk and 8 wk of consolidation respectively. The mandibles were harvested and the left mandible received X-ray examination for bone healing, and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) dectection for the bone mineral density (BMD) of newly formed bone in the distraction gap. The biomechanical properties of the new generation bone at 4 th and 8 th week of consolidation in each group were detected by three point bending test. RESULTS: The bone mineral density and the biomechanical strength of newly formed bone increased along the length of consolidation in each group. After 1 week of consolidation, there was no significant difference in BMD among group A (83.43 +/- 9.96), group B (92.29 +/- 11.25), group C (89.93 +/- 14.15), P > 0.05. But the BMD of group A, B and C was higher than that of group D (70. 31 +/- 3.30), P < 0.05. After 2wk, 4 wk and 8 wk of consolidation, the BMD of group B (137.54 +/- 7.20,492.93 +/- 17.57, 790.48 +/- 12.19) was significantly higher than those of group A (121.44 +/- 9.27, 396.15 +/- 15.70, 603.39 +/- 16.46), C (125.06 +/- 7.24, 464.15 +/- 15.45, 764.15 +/- 17.28), and D (98.86 +/- 8.13, 336.45 +/- 11.95, 577.89 +/- 18.43), P < 0.05. The biomechanical parameters were also higher in group B than those of group A, C and D after four and eight weeks of consolidation (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: It is better to transfect gene at the beginning of distraction (distraction period) than at other stages of DO. In this way, more remarkable effect could be obtained on new bone formation. It suggests that the distraction stage is the optimal time for gene therapy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]