These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of pharmacokinetic profiles of zolpidem buffered sublingual tablet and zolpidem oral immediate-release tablet: results from a single-center, single-dose, randomized, open-label crossover study in healthy adults.
    Author: Greenblatt DJ, Harmatz JS, Roth T, Singh NN, Moline ML, Harris SC, Kapil RP.
    Journal: Clin Ther; 2013 May; 35(5):604-11. PubMed ID: 23541711.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: A zolpidem sublingual tablet (ZST) formulation was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat middle-of-the-night (MOTN) awakening with difficulty returning to sleep. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the zolpidem pharmacokinetic profiles of 3.5-mg ZST and 10-mg immediate-release (IR) oral zolpidem in healthy female and male adults. METHODS: This randomized, open-label crossover study compared the pharmacokinetic profile of ZST with that of IR oral zolpidem in healthy adults. RESULTS: The study enrolled 19 males and 14 females. After 3.5-mg ZST and 10-mg IR, respectively, mean zolpidem plasma concentrations at 15 minutes (22 vs 17 ng/mL, respectively, in females and 18 vs 10 ng/mL in males) and AUCs from zero to 15 minutes (2.3 vs 0.8 ng · h/mL in females and 1.6 vs 0.5 ng · h/mL in males) were substantially greater for ZST, despite the larger absolute IR dose. After 3.5-mg ZST and 10-mg IR, respectively, clearance was lower in females, even after correcting for body weight (2.63 vs 2.88 mL/min/kg in females and 3.63 vs 3.91 mL/min/kg in males). The lag time prior to the start of first-order absorption was notably shorter for ZST than IR in both males (8 vs 21 minutes) and females (5 vs 22 minutes). Both zolpidem formulations were generally well tolerated by both genders. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic exposure of zolpidem was higher in females for both formulations. Plasma levels and AUC were higher, and clearance was lower, in females with both zolpidem formulations. The initial rate of absorption was faster, and initial systemic exposure was greater, with ZST compared with oral IR.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]