These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Prognostic value of multiple emerging biomarkers in cardiovascular risk prediction in patients with stable cardiovascular disease.
    Author: Ahluwalia N, Blacher J, Szabo de Edelenyi F, Faure P, Julia C, Hercberg S, Galan P.
    Journal: Atherosclerosis; 2013 Jun; 228(2):478-84. PubMed ID: 23582589.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined simultaneously the prognostic value of traditional and emerging biomarkers including atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), for major cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes in patients with stable CVD, and results are equivocal. DESIGN: and METHODS: Mid-regional pro-ANP (MR-proANP) and N-Terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP), CRP and homocysteine were measured in stable CVD patients (n = 1456; age: 61.8 y) at inclusion in the SU.FOL.OM3 cohort. Prospective association of biomarkers with risk of heart failure, major cardiovascular (non-fatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or death from CVD) or overall cardiovascular event were examined with Cox proportional-hazards analyses. Increase in prediction risk upon addition of biomarker(s) to the traditional risk model was examined by change in C-statistic, NRI and IDI. RESULTS: During follow-up (median: 4.7 y), 40 heart failure, 145 major cardiovascular and 493 overall cardiovascular events were diagnosed. In models adjusted for age, sex, smoking, diabetes, serum creatinine and CVD inclusion criteria, NT-proBNP and CRP associated significantly with heart failure. Both natriuretic peptides predicted the risk of major cardiovascular events in adjusted models; Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI for each SD increase in MR-proANP and NT-proBNP were 1.24 (1.04-1.47), and 1.31 (1.09-1.57), respectively. The addition of NT-proBNP to a traditional risk model increased significantly the area-under-curve for heart failure and overall cardiovascular events (by 6 and 12%, respectively); addition of MR-proANP or homocysteine yielded modest (2%) but statistically significant increase for major cardiovascular events. CONCLUSION: NT-proBNP consistently predicted CVD outcomes and may be useful singly or in combination with MR-proANP for risk-stratification in high-risk patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]