These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [AC and DC electroretinography in degenerative retinal diseases].
    Author: Kellner U, Foerster MH.
    Journal: Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 2358278.
    Abstract:
    In clinical electrophysiology AC-recorded ERGs are used for the investigation of a- and b-wave parameters. The direct coupled (DC-ERG) ist used to record the c-wave. Theoretically the DC-ERG technique has less influence on the recorded potentials than the AC-ERG technique. We recorded AC- and DC-ERGs of 20 normal eyes, 17 eyes with x-linked congenital retinoschisis and 30 eyes with retinal degenerations. In normal eyes no difference was found between AC- und DC-ERG concerning a- and b-wave amplitudes, latencies and implicit times, the b/a-ratios and the oscillatory potentials. The 30 Hz flicker amplitude was higher in the DC-ERG (p less than 0.0003). The intraindividual variability of all measured parameters was comparable between AC- and DC-ERG. In x-linked retinoschisis the b-wave amplitudes and the b/a-ratios were lower in the DC-ERG than in the AC-ERG. In retinal degenerative diseases the a-wave amplitudes were higher and the dark-adapted b-wave amplitudes lower in the DC-ERG, therefore the b/a-ratio was lower in the DC-ERG. We conclude, the DC-ERG is a reproducible method for clinical routine investigations. It is comparable to the conventional AC-ERG technique. In certain diseases the pathological features of the electroretinogram were more distinct in the DC-ERG than the AC-ERG.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]