These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The search for biomarkers of metastatic seminoma.
    Author: Ruf CG, Khalili-Harbi N, Sachs S, Isbarn H, Wagner W, Matthies C, Meineke V, Fisch M, Chun FK, Abend M.
    Journal: J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):1046-51. PubMed ID: 23583226.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: We screened 90 potential parameters as biomarkers of metastatic seminoma to facilitate detection and eliminate unnecessary therapeutic or diagnostic efforts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 527 men with pure seminoma (diagnosed 2000 to 2011) were followed during therapy. More than 90 demographic/anamnestic (eg age, height, weight) histopathological parameters (testicular/tumor size, testicular intraepithelial neoplasia) and levels of tumor markers (eg α-fetoprotein, β-human chorionic gonadotropin, lactate dehydrogenase) in peripheral blood and testicular vein were collected for analysis via logistic regression. Previously described risk factors (tumors larger than 4 cm, infiltration of rete testis) were assessed separately. RESULTS: Established parameters such as tumor length (p = 0.0003), involvement of lymphatic (p <0.0001) or vascular channels (p = 0.0009), extent of primary tumor (p <0.0001) and infiltration of the tunica albuginea (p = 0.02) as well as new biomarkers such as absence of testicular intraepithelial neoplasia in tumor bearing testis (p = 0.03), testicular volume (p = 0.04) and tumor volume (p = 0.02) showed a significant association with metastatic disease. This association was also true of lactate dehydrogenase, human chorionic gonadotropin and α-fetoprotein (p <0.0001 at maximum). However, the discriminatory capacity of these biomarkers (concordance or ROC area) did not exceed 65% when examined alone or in combination, and higher values (up to 80%) were detected for enzyme levels. A subset of metastatic seminoma (2% to 27%) was detectable with high accuracy (positive predictive value 92% to 100%) based on enzyme measurements (p <0.0006). CONCLUSIONS: New biomarkers of metastatic seminoma were identified and previously described risk factors were validated. Further prospective studies of these novel parameters are warranted to verify our findings and to explore a potential use for detecting occult metastases.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]