These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Discordance between non-HDL-cholesterol and LDL-particle measurements: results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.
    Author: Degoma EM, Davis MD, Dunbar RL, Mohler ER, Greenland P, French B.
    Journal: Atherosclerosis; 2013 Aug; 229(2):517-23. PubMed ID: 23591415.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular risk assessment incorporates measurement of atherogenic lipids such as non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C). It remains uncertain under which circumstances atherogenic lipoprotein enumeration such as LDL particle number (LDL-P) differs from simultaneously acquired non-HDL-C. METHODS: Participants of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) were deemed LDL-P > non-HDL-C discordant if they exhibited higher LDL-P than expected for simultaneously measured non-HDL-C, given the observed distribution of both in MESA. Conversely, a lower LDL-P than would be suggested from non-HDL-C characterized LDL-P < non-HDL-C discordance. Regression models were used to estimate associations of demographics and comorbidities with discordance and of LDL-P and non-HDL-C with carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and detectable coronary artery calcium (CAC) among discordance groups. RESULTS: Discordance was observed among 44% of subjects. LDL-P > non-HDL-C compared to LDL-P < non-HDL-C discordance was more common among Hispanics and smokers; among subjects with lower HDL-C, lower triglycerides, or greater insulin resistance by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR); and among subjects on lipid-lowering therapy, anti-hypertensive therapy, or hormone replacement therapy. In the setting of discordance, LDL-P exhibited a modestly greater association with CIMT than did non-HDL-C (+0.024-0.025 mm vs +0.018-0.021 mm per SD increase). In the presence of LDL-P < non-HDL-C discordance, LDL-P demonstrated a modestly greater association with detectable CAC than did non-HDL-C (OR 1.51 vs 1.46 per SD increase). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that disagreement between LDL-P and non-HDL-C was common and significantly associated with several clinical characteristics. In the setting of discordance, LDL-P was more closely associated with CIMT and CAC than non-HDL-C, though observed differences were small.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]