These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in malignant eyelid tumor: hybrid single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography and dual dye technique.
    Author: Vuthaluru S, Pushker N, Lokdarshi G, Kumar R, Bajaj MS, Kashyap S, Mathur S, Chawla B, Khurana S, Ghose S.
    Journal: Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 156(1):43-49.e2. PubMed ID: 23628352.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To study the utility of hybrid single photon emission computed tomography / computed tomography (SPECT/CT) scan and dual-dye technique in identification of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) in patients with an advanced malignant eyelid tumor. DESIGN: Nonrandomized prospective interventional study. METHODS: setting: A tertiary eye care center. study population: Patients with an advanced malignant eyelid tumor without clinically involved regional lymph nodes. intervention: SLN biopsy was performed using dual-dye technique (a combination of radiotracer and vital blue dye) following localization by SPECT/CT. main outcome measures: Localization of SLN in the regional node basin by hybrid SPECT/CT scan; SLN identification rate using dual-dye technique; SLN positivity rate; false-negative rate; and complications, if any, of SLN biopsy. RESULTS: Sixteen patients of biopsy-proven eyelid malignancy (7 squamous cell carcinomas [43.75%], 5 sebaceous cell carcinomas [31.25%], and 4 malignant melanomas [25%]) were included in the study. Preoperative localization of SLN was performed using SPECT/CT in 12 patients. SLN biopsy using dual-dye technique was performed in 16 patients. SPECT/CT accurately localized SLN in 11 out of 12 patients. The preauricular region was the most common site of SLN. SLN identification rates for dual-dye, radiotracer, and blue dye techniques were 100% (16/16 patients), 100% (16/16 patients), and 87.5% (14/16 patients), respectively. SLN showed metastasis in 2 patients (12.5%). On follow-up, 1 patient developed cervical lymph node metastasis, thus giving a false-negative rate of 7.14%. There were no complications associated with SLN biopsy. CONCLUSION: Accurate preoperative localization of SLN in relation to adjacent anatomic structures using SPECT/CT aids in intraoperative identification of SLN. SLN biopsy should be considered in patients with eyelid tumors at significant risk for metastasis who have clinically negative nodal basins. Dual-dye technique is safe and feasible in advanced eyelid tumors. Blue dye technique can be used for SLN biopsy in settings where nuclear medicine facilities are not available, albeit with a lower SLN identification rate. Detection of metastasis in SLNs in ∼12% of cases emphasizes the utility of SLN biopsy in accurate staging and treatment of eyelid malignancies.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]