These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: In-season root-zone N management for mitigating greenhouse gas emission and reactive N losses in intensive wheat production.
    Author: Cui Z, Yue S, Wang G, Zhang F, Chen X.
    Journal: Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jun 04; 47(11):6015-22. PubMed ID: 23662999.
    Abstract:
    Although both the grain yields and environmental costs of nitrogen (N) fertilization are gaining more public and scientific debate, the complex linkages among crop productivity, N application rate, environmental footprints, and the consequences of improved N management are not well understood. We considered the concept of linking greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, reactive N losses, and N fertilizer application rates with crop productivity to determine the response of the GHG emission and reactive N losses to N surplus and further evaluated the potential to reduce these N environmental footprints by in-season root-zone N management. A meta-analysis suggested an exponential increase in the response of direct N2O emissions and nitrate leaching to an increasing N surplus, while NH3 volatilization increased linearly with an increasing N application rate for intensive wheat production in north China. The GHG emission and reactive N losses during N fertilizer application increased exponentially with an increasing N surplus. By pooling all 121 on-farm experimental sites, an in-season root-zone N management strategy was shown to reduce the N application rate by 61% from 325 kg N ha(-1) to 128 kg N ha(-1) compared to the farmers' N practice, with no loss in wheat grain yield. As a result, the intensity of GHG emission and reactive N losses were reduced by 77% and 80%, respectively. The intensity of GHG emission and reactive N losses can be further reduced due to the improved N recovery and increased grain yield achieved by best crop management. In conclusion, N recovery efficiency and yield improvements should be used to reduce future agricultural N environmental footprints, rather than reducing the N application rate.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]