These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Diagnosis of irritative-toxic isocyanate asthma with the isocyanate exposure test].
    Author: Behr J, Baur X, Römmelt H, Fruhmann G.
    Journal: Pneumologie; 1990 Feb; 44 Suppl 1():229-31. PubMed ID: 2367373.
    Abstract:
    We investigated 10 healthy control subjects, 15 asthmatics without occupational exposure to isocyanate, and 45 "isocyanate workers" with workplace-related respiratory symptoms. In none of the cases did the skin test or the IgE-RAST reveal a type I sensitisation to isocyanate. The investigation programme included a lung function test, provocation with metacholine or acetylcholine, and an isocyanate challenge test under controlled clinical conditions. A total of 17 "isocyanate workers", and 1 asthma patient with no occupational exposure to isocyanate revealed a positive bronchial obstructive reaction to the isocyanate challenge test. In 10 of the patients, the MCH (ACH) test was positive; 2 were chronically obstructive, but 6 patients showed no signs of bronchial hyperreactivity. No significant differences in the severity of the bronchial obstructive reaction induced by isocyanate exposure were observed between patients with and those without bronchial hyperreactivity. In the group of "isocyanate workers", the isocyanate challenge test was observed to be superior to the MCH (ACH) provocation test in terms of sensitivity (0.68 versus 0.62) and specificity (1.0 versus 0.61), this difference being more obvious in the overall group (sensitivity 0.71 versus 0.62; specificity 0.98 versus 0.49).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]