These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Lymph node ratio may predict the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Author: Urban D, Bar J, Solomon B, Ball D.
    Journal: J Thorac Oncol; 2013 Jul; 8(7):940-6. PubMed ID: 23695418.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: The use of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) after resection of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial, with some evidence suggesting a benefit in patients with N2 disease. We assessed lymph node ratio (LNR) as a predictor of PORT benefit. METHODS: By using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, we analyzed resected, node-positive (N1-N2) NSCLC patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2009. LNR, (number of positive nodes/number of resected nodes) was categorized into four groups: LNR less than 12.5%, 12.5 to 24.9%, 25 to 49.9%, and 50% or more. RESULTS: Of 11,324 node-positive NSCLC patients identified, 6551 (57.9%) had N1 disease. The LNR was prognostic for survival in the entire cohort and within each nodal stage. The median survival in LNR groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 43, 40, 30, and 23 months in N1 disease and 40, 32, 27, and 22 months in N2 disease, respectively. PORT was associated with a worse survival on univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] =1.09; confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.15; p = 0.002) but no effect on multivariate analysis (HR = 0.96; CI 0.90-1.02; p = 0.201). When analyzed by nodal stage, the benefit of PORT was limited to N2 disease (HR = 0.9; CI 0.84-0.99; p= 0.026) with no benefit in N1 disease (HR = 1.06; CI 0.97-1.15; p=0.2). After stratifying by LNR, the survival benefit of PORT was limited to those with N2 disease and an LNR of 50% or more. CONCLUSION: A high LNR is associated with a poorer survival in resected, node-positive NSCLC. The survival benefit associated with PORT in this disease seems to be limited to those with an LNR of 50% or more. This warrants further investigation in other cohorts and prospective studies.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]