These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Timing of prophylactic antibiotic at cesarean section: a double-blinded, randomized trial.
    Author: Francis C, Mumford M, Strand ML, Moore ES, Strand EA.
    Journal: J Perinatol; 2013 Oct; 33(10):759-62. PubMed ID: 23702621.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to determine the effect of the timing of prophylactic antibiotics for cesarean section on post-operative infectious complications. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial in which patients were randomized to receive cefazolin or clindamycin either before skin incision or after cord clamp. The primary outcome was maternal infectious morbidity at 6 weeks postpartum, a composite infectious outcome, which included endometritis, urinary tract infection, wound infection and pneumonia. RESULT: Data on 896 women were analyzed; 449 randomized to skin incision, 447 to cord clamp. Postpartum infections were seen in a total of 8.4% of patients. Timing of antibiotic administration did not significantly affect any maternal postpartum infection rates or selected neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that, in a largely non-laboring population, the timing of prophylactic antibiotic administration does not impact post-operative infectious complications of the mother. Despite being one of the largest randomized controlled trials to address this question, our study still lacked sufficient power to make definitive conclusions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]