These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Pre-transplant FDG-PET-based survival model in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma: outcome after high-dose chemotherapy and auto-SCT.
    Author: Akhtar S, Al-Sugair AS, Abouzied M, Alkadhi Y, Dingle M, Abdelsalam M, Soudy H, Darwish A, Eltigani A, Elhassan TA, Nabil-Ahmed M, Maghfoor I.
    Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant; 2013 Nov; 48(12):1530-6. PubMed ID: 23749108.
    Abstract:
    Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients with positive (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) post salvage chemotherapy or before high-dose chemotherapy and auto-SCT (HDC ASCT) have inferior outcomes. We reviewed 21 prognostic factors before salvage chemotherapy (at relapse/progression) and integrated post salvage FDG-PET results to develop a prognostic model for post HDC ASCT outcome. We used Fine and Gray method for competing risk analysis and regression model for risks assessment and outcome. One hundred and forty-one patients had post salvage FDG-PET before HDC ASCT (median age 25.5 years); male/female 55%:45%, relapsed/refractory 43%:57%, median follow-up 33 months. Multivariate analysis identified HL International Prognostic Score 3 (P=0.001; hazard ratio (HR): 3.7 (1.6-8.3)) and post salvage positive FDG-PET (P=0.011; HR: 3.4 (1.3-8.9)) with higher hazard of disease-specific death (model P=0.0001). Cumulative incidence of disease-specific death with 0, 1, 2 risk factors was 7%:29%:52%, respectively (P=0.00003). For disease-specific event (persistent, progressive or relapsed disease), mediastinal involvement (P=0.024; HR: 2.7 (1.14-6.5)), B symptoms (P=0.027; HR: 2.1 (1.09-4.2)) and positive post salvage FDG-PET (P=0.001; HR: 3.3 (1.7-6.7)) were significant (model P=<0.00001). Cumulative incidence of disease-specific event with 0, 1, 2, 3 risk factors was 8%:31%:50%:75%, respectively (P=0.0000006). Patients with higher scores have higher risk of treatment failure. They are potential candidates for newer therapies along with HDC ASCT.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]