These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Group versus single handed primary care: a performance evaluation of the care delivered to chronic patients by Italian GPs.
    Author: Visca M, Donatini A, Gini R, Federico B, Damiani G, Francesconi P, Grilli L, Rampichini C, Lapini G, Zocchetti C, Di Stanislao F, Brambilla A, Moirano F, Bellentani D.
    Journal: Health Policy; 2013 Nov; 113(1-2):188-98. PubMed ID: 23800605.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: In family medicine contrasting evidence exists on the effectiveness of team practice compared with solo practice on chronic disease management. In Italy, several experiences of team practice have been introduced since the late 1990s but few studies detail their impact on the quality of care. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the impact of team practice in family medicine in six Italian regions using chronic disease management process indicators as a measure of outcome. METHODS: Cross-sectional studies were performed to assess impact on quality of care for diabetes, congestive heart failure and ischaemic heart disease. The impact of team vs. solo practice was approximated through performance comparison of general practitioners (GPs) adhering to a team with respect to GPs working in a solo practice. Among the 2082 practitioners working in the 6 regions those assisting 300+ patients were selected. Quality of care towards 164,267 patients having at least one of three chronic conditions was estimated for the year 2008 using administrative databases. Quality indicators (% of patients receiving appropriate care) were selected (4 for diabetes, 4 for congestive heart failure, 3 for ischaemic heart disease) and a total score was computed for each patient. For each disease the response variable associated to each physician was the average score of the patients on his/her list. A multilevel model was estimated assessing the impact of team vs. solo practice. RESULTS: No impact was found for diabetes and heart failure. For ischaemic heart disease a slightly significant impact was observed (0.040; 95% CI: 0.015, 0.065). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference was found between team practice and solo practice on chronic disease management in six Italian regions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]