These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Parameter optimization for non-contrast-enhanced selective magnetic resonance portography imaging]. Author: Wang X, Du SD, Xue HD, Jin ZY, Yang YY, Liu MY, Zhao XZ, Sun ZY, Jin Y, Sun HY. Journal: Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2013 Jun; 35(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 23827068. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate subtraction images acquired with 3D true steady-state free-precession(SSFP)sequence combined with time-spatial labeling inversion pulse(T-SLIP)for selective and non-contrast-enhanced(non-CE)visualization of the portal venous system,and explore the optimization of this protocol. METHODS: Totally 13 healthy volunteers were recruited.Respiratory-triggered 3D true SSFP sequences on a 1.5T MRI system combined with T-SLIP placed on the spleen and mesenteric area were performed.The portographic images were generated from the subtraction between the pulse on and off images.According to the difference in inversion time(TI)of T-SLIP,four image groups group A(TI of 1300 ms),group B(TI of 1100 ms),group C(TI of 900 ms)and group D(TI of 700 ms),were assigned and compared to detect the optimal TI for portography.For quantitative analysis,the signal intensity(SI)of left and right liver lobe,the large vessels as main,right and left portal vein(MPV,RPV and LPV,respectively)and small vessels as branches of segments four(P4),six(P6)and eight(P8)were measured.The relative SI of MPV,RPV and LPV,as well as P4,P6 and P8 were also compared.For qualitative evaluation,the quality score of visualization was also evaluated using a 4-point scale.One-Way ANOVA and LSD test were used for comparison of quantitative data,and Friedman signed rank test was used for comparison of qualitative scores. RESULTS: In 52 sequences of 13 volunteers,the selective visualization of the portal vein was all successfully conducted.Quantitative evaluation showed significant increased SI at the left lobe between C and D groups and A and B groups(comparison of group C to group A and BP=0.004,0.011;comparison of group D to group A and BP=0.001,0.004),while relative SI of LPV of groups C and D were lower than groups A and B(comparison of group C to group A and BP=0.015,0.015;comparison of group D to group A and BP=0.000,0.000).The relative SI of MPV in group D were decreased than groups A(P=0.000),B(P=0.000),and C(P=0.019).There was no significant difference in relative SI of small vessels among four groups(P>0.05).The image score of portal vessels in four groups also showed no differences(P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 3D true SSFP scan with T-SLIP enabled selective non-CE visualization of the portal vein with digital subtraction method.A fixed TI of both 1300 and 1100 ms can be preferable.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]