These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Impact of reticular pseudodrusen on macular function.
    Author: Querques G, Massamba N, Srour M, Boulanger E, Georges A, Souied EH.
    Journal: Retina; 2014 Feb; 34(2):321-9. PubMed ID: 23842105.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of reticular pseudodrusen on macular function using microperimetry. METHODS: Eighteen consecutive patients (18 eyes) with reticular pseudodrusen (Group 1), and without medium/large drusen, underwent microperimetry. Eighteen age-matched and sex-matched subjects (18 eyes) with typical drusen and without pseudodrusen (Group 2) also underwent microperimetry. Macular sensitivity was assessed by microperimetry and compared between the two Groups. RESULTS: Mean age of patients with reticular pseudodrusen and with typical drusen was 77.3 ± 6.8 years and 75.0 ± 9.9 years, respectively (P = 0.4), and 61.1% and 61.1% were women, respectively. Mean best-corrected visual acuity was 0.14 ± 0.09 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution and 0.13 ± 0.09 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (P = 0.8) in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. Microperimetry revealed a significant difference in overall mean macular sensitivity ("square 7 × 7"; 49 points) between Group 1 and Group 2 (5.9 ± 1.7 dB vs. 8.8 ± 2.4 dB, P < 0.001). Both mean central macular sensitivity ("square 3 × 3"; 9 points) and mean peripheral macular microperimetric sensitivity (overall "square 7 × 7" - central "square 3 × 3"; 40 points) were significantly reduced in Group 1 compared with Group 2 (central macular sensitivity: 6.9 ± 1.7 dB vs. 8.9 ± 2.6 dB in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively; P = 0.01; peripheral macular sensitivity: 5.7 ± 1.8 dB vs. 8.7 ± 2.3 dB in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively; P < 0.001). In Group 1, mean peripheral sensitivity was reduced when compared with mean central sensitivity (5.7 ± 1.8 dB vs. 6.9 ± 1.7 dB, P = 0.01), whereas in Group 2, mean sensitivity was similar in both peripheral and central macula (8.7 ± 2.3 dB vs. 8.9 ± 2.6 dB, P = 0.4). CONCLUSION: Eyes with reticular pseudodrusen present a greater extent of reduced sensitivity than eyes with typical drusen.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]