These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Lymph node metastases in rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy: impact of intramesorectal distribution and residual micrometastatic involvement.
    Author: Sprenger T, Rothe H, Becker H, Beissbarth T, Homayounfar K, Gauss K, Kitz J, Wolff H, Scheel AH, Ghadimi M, Rödel C, Conradi LC, Liersch T.
    Journal: Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Aug; 37(8):1283-9. PubMed ID: 23851331.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: After neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT), the pathologic determined lymph node (LN) status is the most important prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients. Here we assessed the prognostic impact of residual LN micrometastases (<0.2 cm) and the intramesorectal distribution of LN metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Surgical specimens from 81 patients with cUICC II/III rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant CRT and total mesorectal excision within the German Rectal Cancer Trial CAO/ARO/AIO-04 were prospectively evaluated. The entire mesorectal compartment was paraffin embedded and screened microscopically. The number and distribution of mesorectal LN macrometastases and micrometastases were correlated with disease-free (DFS) and cancer-specific overall survival (CSS). RESULTS: A total of 2412 LNs were detected (mean 29.8±13.7). Twenty-five patients had residual LN metastases (ypN+). The incidence of metastases in the peritumoral mesorectum was higher (7.7%) than that proximal to the tumor (1.5%), whereas no metastases were identified below the tumor level. Patients with both proximal and peritumoral involvement showed a significantly reduced CSS (hazard ratio=5.4; P<0.05). Fourteen patients with ypN+ status (56%) had micrometastases, 9 patients (36%) had only micrometastatic involvement. Patients with nodal macrometastases had a reduced DFS (P<0.01) and CSS (P<0.005) as compared with ypN0 patients, whereas residual micrometastases had no influence on survival. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high incidence of residual LN micrometastases they did not seem to have a prognostic impact in this series. Micrometastases might indicate responsive tumors to CRT with a more favorable biology. The intramesorectal distribution of LN metastases had a prognostic impact and should be validated in further studies.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]